1910's to the early 1920's ~ A woman's beauty during this time was not an aspect of one's life to be contemplated heavily. Women pre-19th amendment were more concerned with gaining recognition of their equality then how they looked. Women felt beauty came from within and was not a product one could buy. Attractiveness was being strong and powerful: " In the late 1910's and early 1920's female athletes began to ellipse movie stars as the nations beauty archetypes" (Faludi 204)

Late 1920's ~ After women achieved the vote in 1920 women, they felt as if they were equal and were able to be whatever they chose. If they wanted to make themselves up, they could. If they wanted to work or stay home, or anything else, they could. "Flapper Jane," the ideal figure of the 1920s, is the object of constant analysis. "She is, for one thing, a very pretty girl. Beauty is the fashion in 1925" (Flapper Jane, 65). When reading Flapper Jane one gets a sense that "Jane" felt that she was equal and her beauty was just something that she did and not something that did her". "Women still want to be loved, but they want it to be on a 50 / 50 basis which includes being admired for the qualities they possess" (Flapper Jane, 67).
Post World War II ~. Here we saw women being oppressed by the beauty industry. Women were subject to what society determined as beautiful. Exquisite movie stars who were curvy and charming, with pale skin, frosted hair and a seemingly grand lifestyle was the ideal. "Beauty publicists instructed women to inflate their breasts with padding or silicone, to frost their hair with carcinogenic dyes, to make themselves paler by whitening their face and lips with titanium to emulate that most bleached glamour girl of them all, Marilyn Monroe" (Faludi, 204). They were pressured to be beautiful at the sake of their health. Over and over women were told that they could desire no greater destiny then to glory in their own femininity. Experts told them how to catch a man and keep him (i.e., how to dress, look, act more feminine and make marriage more exciting).

By 1968 ~ Women protested the idea of being seen as sex objects. In Atlantic City women demonstrated against the 1968 Miss America Pageant - the whole event had been made out to be more anti-beauty then it truly was. The women who protested the event were not against the women participating; in fact, the protesters proclaimed solidarity with the contestants. The Women's Liberation Movement chose the Miss America Pageant because to them it represented all the things wrong with society's way of dealing with women: " The contestants epitomize the role all women had to play in society, one way or the other: a political, unoffending, passive delicate thing" (Morgan, 64). The pageant was the beginning of the bouncing back of the women"s movement and thus beauty was once again the liberator.

In the1970's ~ Women no longer subjected themselves to past health-hazardous beauty regimens. The beauty industry felt that if they were going to make any profits they had to find a way to celebrate this new feeling of power women had. In the winter of 1973, Charles Revlon called a high-level meeting of Revlon executives. He told them that he had a revolutionary concept:a fragrance that celebrated women's liberation. The fragrance now known as Charlie was the product of several months of interviewing women about what they wanted in a perfume. "Charlie symbolized that new lifestyle." Revlon executive vice president Lawrence Wechsler recalls, "that said you can be anything you want to be, you can do anything you want to do, without any criticism being directed at you. If you want to wear a pantsuit at the office instead of a skirt, fine" (Faludi 205).
The 1980's ~. Again we saw regression, and women are repressed by beauty and sex appeal. The 1980's saw the start of the plastic surgery craze. Women were trying all sorts of measures to be the sexy, beautiful, thin and presumably happy women they saw in the advertisements and on TV. Mannequin designer Filoso believed that this attitude was a big improvement over the attitude of the 1970's, when women "didn't care" about their appearance. Now they not only cared about how they looked, but the medical technology was there to be able to make them look like whomever they wanted. Today, women can look at a beautiful mannequin in a store and say, "I want to look like her" and she can actually can! They went to their doctors and said "Doc, I want these cheek bones", "Doc, I want these breasts". The question I want to ask people is this: do you actually want to look like a mannequin or yourself?
The 1990's ~ As you can see, feminine beauty is subjective to the time in which you are referring. The 1990's brought a need for women to feel beautiful and thin at almost any cost. The market is swamped with anti-aging products and there are huge advancements in cosmetic surgery, all in the name of beauty. It is now easier than ever for women to "enhance" their face and/or body. Although women of the 1990's accept that they can do anything they choose to, they still question their self-image. The beauty industry now sees women as individuals and begins to develop products to suit different skin types and age groups. Products are more easily marketed via television info-commercials and the Internet. Long-lasting results and easy access are the names of the game.

Today ~ Women are more conscious of natural health and beauty. While we still seem to have the stigma of needing larger breasts, women now tend to exercise more for the perfection they seek. Staying out of the sun and using self-tanning cream is a must. Eating healthy and taking vitamins will give you the good skin and hair you crave. Body massages, facials and bikini waxes are the current trends. Women seem more comfortable doing their own things for their individual beauty needs. Let's face it: women today are both sexy and smart. Only time will tell what we choose to do with the knowledge we've gained!


Return to Beauty Menu

Copyright © 2003 Sssh.Com • All International Rights Reserved